Prevalence and clinical impact of donor-specific alloantibody among intestinal transplant recipients

EY Cheng, MJ Everly, H Kaneku, N Banuelos… - …, 2017 - journals.lww.com
EY Cheng, MJ Everly, H Kaneku, N Banuelos, LJ Wozniak, RS Venick, EA Marcus
Transplantation, 2017journals.lww.com
Background Rejection remains the leading cause of allograft loss, and a major barrier to
improving long-term outcomes after intestinal transplantation. Our aim is to define the
prevalence and investigate the role of donor-specific antibody (DSA) on intestinal graft
outcomes. Methods The study includes 109 transplants performed in 95 recipients at a
single center. Patients were screened for DSA pretransplant, monitored regularly
posttransplant and when clinically indicated using the single-antigen bead Luminex assay …
Background
Rejection remains the leading cause of allograft loss, and a major barrier to improving long-term outcomes after intestinal transplantation. Our aim is to define the prevalence and investigate the role of donor-specific antibody (DSA) on intestinal graft outcomes.
Methods
The study includes 109 transplants performed in 95 recipients at a single center. Patients were screened for DSA pretransplant, monitored regularly posttransplant and when clinically indicated using the single-antigen bead Luminex assay. Standard induction immunosuppression was with interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, and antithymocyte globulin in high-risk recipients. Maintenance regimens were tacrolimus-based.
Results
Pretransplant DSA was detected in 12 (11%) recipients with 50% continuing to have circulating antibodies posttransplant. An additional 24 (25%) patients developed de novo DSA, and of these, 71% had persistent antibodies. Recipients with preformed DSA demonstrated elevated risks of early graft failure, whereas those with de novo DSA experienced accelerated graft loss once DSA was detected, reaching a 28% failure rate within 2 years. HLA-DQ mismatch is a significant risk factor for de novo DSA emergence, whereas the persistence of antibodies is predicted by DSA strength and specificity. Although inclusion of the liver in the intestinal allograft imparts an immunological advantage against rejection-related graft loss, this protective effect was lost among recipients with persistent DSA.
Conclusions
The presence of DSA is associated with inferior graft outcomes among intestinal transplant recipients. An enhanced understanding of the mechanisms by which DSA causes allograft injury, and effective strategies targeting humoral immune reactivity are needed to improve long-term intestinal graft outcomes.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins